Embedded Systems Testing and Validation

In the world of embedded engineering, products follow a defined path before reaching customers. In this complex landscape, where software and hardware combine to power critical systems, assuring quality, reliability, and safety becomes paramount. Unlike regular software, embedded software tightly integrates with hardware, demanding strict testing and validation.

Embedded systems testing is the cornerstone, involving thorough validation of both software and hardware to ensure a seamless system operation. It ensures the end product meets user’s functionality and reliability expectations. This process is distinct from regular software testing, as it’s often times manual and performed on embedded systems.

In simpler terms, embedded testing verifies that the end product combining hardware and software meets product requirements. This meticulous approach is crucial, especially for critical applications such as military and medical sectors, and should be concluded before obtaining safety certification.

How to perform Embedded Systems Testing

When it comes to embedded software testing, there are essential steps and methods to ensure software quality and dependability. But before delving into the process, it’s crucial to grasp why testing matters. This involves finding bugs, reducing risks, cutting development costs, and boosting overall performance.

Much like testing regular software, embedded software begins by feeding it with specific input data. The code is then set in motion using these inputs, and the resulting actions are closely observed. During the procedure, keeping a watchful eye on the embedded system’s condition is a must. This encompasses variables, memory usage, and other pertinent indicators.

Once the code has been executed, the next step is to compare the outcome against the predetermined requirements and expected results. The goal here is to ensure that the execution aligns with the intended functionality, and the software functions without unexpected hitches or crashes. This process ensures the software operates as intended.

In embedded software testing, two prominent techniques are commonly used:

• Black Box Testing: This technique involves a comprehensive verification process, where all possible input values are considered. However, this can result in an infinite number of test cases. To manage this complexity, techniques like equivalence partitioning and boundary-value analysis are applied. These methods efficiently address this challenge by categorizing input values into distinct partitions and examining boundary cases. This focused approach ensures that every partition of equivalent data, representing input values, is covered at least once.
• White Box Testing: also referred to as Clear Box or Glass Box testing, this approach delves into the code’s internal structure and logic. Its main goals include enhancing security, refining design aspects, and improving overall usability. Testers actively select specific inputs to navigate through targeted paths within the code. This process allows them to assess the code’s behavior, identify potential vulnerabilities, and verify the expected outputs.

Types of Embedded Systems Testing

According to system type and general usage in the software industry, we consider embedded software testing types or levels below:

• Unit testing: Unit testing is a fundamental aspect of software development, focusing on testing individual components or units of code, which can be either classes or functions. It’s a practice often carried out by developers themselves. During this phase, specific test cases are created based on the module’s specifications.
  In the realm of software engineering, every software solution is composed of discrete units or components. Unit testing aims to ensure that the code within each unit functions according to expectations. Typically executed during the development process, unit testing is led by the developer responsible for that particular module.

• Integration testing: After the modules have been individually unit tested, we start putting them together to see how they work when combined. There are different ways to combine them, from the top or from the bottom. It doesn’t matter which way we use, as long as we understand how they behave together. We start with the first two modules and keep adding more until we have the whole system. It’s best to test at every stage.
  Integration testing makes sure puzzle pieces fit well. It validates that the modules work together correctly according to the predetermined rules.
  Testing environment is usually built in parallel with the software, however testing is tricky since you can’t do a complete test in a simulated environment.

• System testing: System testing ensures that the entire system or product adheres to the overarching system requirements. The system tester acts as the customer’s advocate, with user requirement documents or corresponding specifications serving as guiding references.
  Various methods, including both simulated and actual execution, can be used for system testing. In scenarios like a space shuttle launch, where testing actual software isn’t feasible, elaborate simulations are employed to replicate external conditions. This approach underscores the significance of high-quality test simulators, presenting a distinctive quality challenge. While the complexity of simulators and limited alternatives for validation pose challenges, it holds true for automated system tests in general.
  System testing can include multiple quality aspects, including functionality, performance, reliability, and usability.

Acceptance Testing as part of a Validation Testing

Validation is a phase in the software development life cycle that focuses on evaluating a software product or system to ensure that it meets the intended requirements and functions correctly within its intended environment. This process typically occurs at the end of the development cycle, just before the software is deployed to the end-users or customers.

The V-model is a valuable framework for illustrating the relationship between development stages and validation activities, particularly in safety-critical software development.

Acceptance Testing in Embedded Systems is a critical phase in the development of embedded software and hardware systems. It focuses on verifying that the embedded system meets predefined acceptance criteria and is ready for deployment in its intended environment. This type of testing is vital to ensure the software’s functionality aligns with predefined standards and that the system is suitable for its intended use. Typically, acceptance testing is the final stage of the software testing process, occurring after system testing, bug fixing, and verification have taken place.

The significance of acceptance testing cannot be overstated. If the testing team were to skip this crucial step, there would be a heightened risk that the software might not fully align with its initial requirements and specifications. It serves as a vital quality assurance checkpoint, ensuring that the software operates as intended, meets market standards, and can compete effectively with similar products within the industry.

Upon the successful completion of system testing in the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC), acceptance testing becomes imperative. It serves several key purposes: 

• Acceptance testing ensures that the software functions in the desired manner, meeting the expectations set out in the original requirements.
• It validates that the software complies with current industry standards, ensuring that it remains competitive within its market niche.
• Acceptance testing instills confidence in the software, confirming that it is ready for deployment in a production environment. This is particularly crucial in mission-critical or customer-facing applications, where any issues could have far-reaching consequences.

Challenges in Embedded Systems Testing

Embedded testing presents several unique challenges due to its interactions with hardware and specialized nature. Here are some key challenges faced in the realm of embedded testing:

Delivering Quality and Customer Satisfaction

One of our standout advantages lies in our meticulous approach to ATP, documentation, and validation. This commitment is especially crucial as new customers seek to comprehend our release delivery, testing, and design validation procedures. Our ability to provide comprehensive testing report including initial Signal Integrity and Power Integrity simulation results supported with captured measurements from the actual hardware, in addition to functional acceptance test procedure (ATP) report further solidifies the value we provide.

The essence of delivering to customers rests upon surpassing their expectations across several dimensions. Beyond accuracy and completeness, timeliness, security, and ease of access are paramount. Throughout this process, transparent communication with customers remains a cornerstone.

The significance of validating designs before implementation cannot be overstated. This practice influences cost-effectiveness, customer contentment, risk mitigation, time savings, usability, and overall user experience. By identifying and addressing issues at the outset, design validation propels us towards creating successful products that not only cater to customer requirements but also elevate overall user satisfaction.

Our track record of wowing customers stands as a testament to the value we bring. The experiences and results we’ve delivered to existing customers are not only remarkable but also set the standard for all our future customers.

Interested to know more? Get in touch with us for details.