Wireless Communication in Embedded Systems

Embedded systems are extensively used in wireless and mobile communication systems, from smartphones and laptops to home appliances, industrial automation, and the Internet of Things (IoT). They leverage a variety of wireless communication protocols such as WiFi, BLE, Zigbee, Cellular, and Z-Wave. Collectively, these wireless protocols have brought us closer together and more connected than ever before.

In this blog post, we’ll delve into the essential elements of wireless communication technologies in embedded systems. We’ll explore the differences between low-power and high-power solutions, weigh the strengths of Bluetooth, Wifi, LoRa, Cellular Networks, Z-Wave, and Zigbee, look at the contrasts between long-range and short-range communications, and consider the trade-offs of high and low bandwidth. Furthermore, we’ll talk about communication architectures, differentiating point-to-point communication from mesh networks. We’ll also discuss how to cleverly blend these features to tailor them to the precise needs of your embedded application. So, let’s get started and unravel the world of wireless communication in embedded systems.

Wireless Communication Protocols in Embedded Systems

Embedded systems are like specialized multitaskers. They are built around tiny but powerful computers (microcontrollers, microprocessors) and are programmed to handle specific jobs. To get their work done, these systems need to talk to other devices, whether it’s through wired or wireless connections. This is where communication protocols come into play, which define how data is transferred between devices.

Wireless communication protocols are the backbone of seamless connectivity and data exchange in embedded systems, serving various applications, from IoT devices to industrial automation. Among the popular choices, Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) shines for low-power, short-range communication, making it ideal for wearables and smart home appliances. Similarly, Zigbee finds its place in applications requiring low data rates, minimal power consumption, and short-range connectivity, often used in industrial control and home automation systems.

Choosing the right protocol depends on application-specific factors such as power efficiency, communication range, data rate, and network architecture. Choice is key to building robust, reliable, and scalable solutions that meet the diverse needs of an expanding embedded systems landscape. These protocols work together to build intelligent and connected automotive embedded ecosystems, enabling features such as real-time traffic updates, and in-car entertainment.

Radio Frequency (RF) transceivers serve as the cornerstone of wireless communications within embedded systems. These devices combine both transmission and reception functions, enabling a two-way flow of data over the airwaves. RF transceivers are versatile, facilitating communication in various protocols and frequency bands like Bluetooth, WiFi, Zigbee, and more.

Now, let’s take a look at some of the common communication protocols and technologies you’ll find in embedded systems:

• Bluetooth

Bluetooth is a short-range wireless technology standard that is used for data exchange between devices over short distances. It uses UHF radio waves of frequency ranging from 2.4 to 2.485 GHz in the ISM (industrial, scientific, and medical) radio band. In the most widely used mode, transmission power is limited to 2.5 milliwatts, giving it a very short range of up to 10 meters. Data can be shared at a maximum data rate of 3 Mbps.

Bluetooth is mainly used as an alternative to wired connections to exchange files between nearby portable devices. That is why Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) and Bluetooth Classic radios are designed to meet the unique needs of developers worldwide.

– Bluetooth Classic is the original version of Bluetooth technology, which was designed for high-bandwidth applications. Operating over 79 channels in the 2.4 GHz ISM (Industrial, Scientific, and Medical) frequency band, it enables devices like phones and headphones to form personal area networks (PANs) to transmit data over short distances. Bluetooth Classic has become important to daily life, particularly as the trend toward smartphone devices without headphone jacks continues. The process of connecting two devices via Classic Bluetooth is now a common skill.

– Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) is a version of Bluetooth technology designed for very low-power operation. Transmitting data over 40 channels in the 2.4 GHz ISM frequency band, this version provides developers a tremendous amount of flexibility to build products that meet the unique connectivity requirements of their market. BLE devices can run on a coin cell battery for months or even years. Although originally known for its device communication capabilities, BLE is now also widely used as a device positioning technology to address the growing demand for high-precision indoor location services. It now includes features that allow one device to determine the presence, distance, and direction of another device.

• WiFi

WiFi (Wireless Fidelity) is the most popular IoT communication protocol for wireless local area networks that utilizes the IEEE 802.11 standard through 2.4 GHz UHF and 5 GHz ISM frequencies. 2.4 GHz WiFi can reach a maximum of 600 Mbps in ideal conditions, but in an average home network, a max speed of 150 Mbps is more likely. A 5 GHz WiFi connection can reach up to 1300 Mbps. 2.4 GHz WiFi can reach up to 46 meters indoors and 92 meters outdoors, meanwhile, 5 GHz frequency spans around one-third of the distances of 2.4 GHz WiFi. It has a data rate of up to 600 Mbps maximum, depending on the channel frequency used and the number of antennas. In embedded systems, ESP series controllers from Espressif are popular for building IoT-based Applications.

There are many development boards available that allow people to build IoT applications using WiFi, for example, Raspberry Pi and Node MCU, which allow people to build IoT prototypes and also can be used for small real-time applications.

• LoRa

LoRa (Long Range) is a wireless technology that offers long-range, low-power, and secure data transmission for M2M and IoT applications. LoRa is based on chirp spread spectrum modulation, which has low power characteristics and can be used for long-range communications.

LoRaWAN provides the ability to connect millions of devices with data rates ranging from 0.3 kbps to 50 kbps. The distance for LoRaWAN application is up to 5 km in urban areas and up to 15 km or more in rural areas. With hundreds of millions of devices connected to networks in more than 100 countries and growing, LoRa is creating a smarter planet.

• Cellular Networks

Embedded systems also leverage cellular networks for wireless communication. The final stage of connectivity is achieved by segmenting the comprehensive service area into several compact zones, each called a cell. This protocol is generally used for long-distance communications. The data of larger size and with higher speeds can be sent compared to other technologies. The fifth generation of cellular networks is 5G. Its frequencies are divided between the Sub-6 GHz range, which has been extended to cover potential new spectrum offerings from 410 MHz to 7125 MHz, and the mmWave range, which includes frequency bands from 24.25 GHz to 71 GHz. The trade-off for speed at mmWave frequencies is the limited range of about 600 meters, while Sub-6 GHz frequencies can cover up to 5 km.

• Z-Wave

Z-Wave, low-power RF, is a communication protocol designed for Home Automation products. Smart home products with Z-Wave inside work together, using just one app to connect and control your smart home from anywhere. While Z-Wave has a range of 100 meters in open air, building materials reduce that range, it is recommended to have a Z-Wave device roughly every 10 meters, or closer for maximum efficiency. The Z-Wave signal can hop roughly 180 meters, and Z-Wave networks can be linked together for even larger deployments. Each Z-Wave network can support up to 232 Z-Wave devices allowing you the flexibility to add as many devices as you’d like to make sure your Smart Home is working its hardest. The data packets are exchanged at data rates of 100 kbps maximum and the protocol operates at a frequency of 900 MHz in the ISM band.

• Zigbee

Zigbee, like Bluetooth but with a longer range, relies on a bridge to facilitate internet-bound data from devices, albeit with higher power consumption. Zigbee has a shorter range of about 10-20 meters indoors because it uses less power. This does dramatically increase battery life for Zigbee devices. The data rate to transfer data between communicated devices is around 250 Kbps. It has a large number of applications in technologies like M2M and IoT.

This wireless communication standard, operating on the IEEE 802.15.4 standard, specializes in serving IoT applications. It offers dependable communication with low data rates and power usage, making it an ideal choice for applications where prolonged battery life is crucial. Zigbee finds its niche in domains like home automation, industrial control, and smart energy management systems, catering to various IoT needs.

Point-To-Point vs Mesh Topology in IoT Networking

Point-to-Point Topology and Mesh Topology are two distinct network architectures employed in computer networking. These topologies differ significantly in terms of their structure, connectivity, scalability, fault tolerance, and implementation.

Mesh Topology is a type of networking where all nodes cooperate to distribute data amongst each other. Originally developed over 30 years ago for military applications, mesh networks are now commonly used for various applications, including home automation, smart HVAC control, and smart buildings. Industry standards that rely on mesh network Topology include Zigbee and Z-Wave.

Mesh Topology can be further categorized into two types: Full Mesh and Partial Mesh. In a Full Mesh Topology, every device has a direct link to every other device, creating a fully connected network. In a Partial Mesh Topology, only some devices have direct links to all other devices, while others have links to only a subset of devices.

One significant advantage of mesh Topology is that it has low transmit power and shorter links (<100 ft). This characteristic not only extends the battery life significantly but also facilitates efficient data movement across the network. The other advantage of mesh Topology is its ability to facilitate self-healing networks in the face of node failures. If one node goes down, alternative connections can be established, enhancing fault tolerance. The primary disadvantage of mesh Topology is that the range between two mesh nodes is quite limited, which means that you may have to add additional nodes into your network that aren’t strictly necessary.

While mesh networks are well-suited for connecting multiple devices, Point-to-Point Topology is employed to connect two specific endpoints. Point-to-Point Topology is a network configuration where two endpoints have a direct connection or link. Serial connections between two devices or a USB connection between a computer and a printer are examples of point-to-point connections.

The primary advantage of Point-to-Point Topology is its simplicity, as it involves a direct flow of data either unidirectional or bidirectional between two points. Point-to-Point networks are still relevant in certain applications such as SCADA systems, traffic data systems, or Point-to-Point broadcast systems like police or fire radios. However, they are less suitable for IoT applications, where connecting to multiple nodes is often more practical.

The Future of Wireless Communications in Embedded Systems

The future of wireless communication in embedded systems promises remarkable advancements and innovations. Here are some key aspects that will define the future landscape:

The integration of 5G networks is set to bring a transformative impact to embedded systems. 5G offers significantly higher data rates, lower latency, and the ability to connect massive numbers of devices, revolutionizing real-time applications, ultra-high-definition video streaming, autonomous systems, and large-scale IoT deployments.

Private 5G networks differ from public 5G networks in that they provide restricted access and utilize licensed or unlicensed wireless spectrum within a confined area, such as a manufacturing plant, port, airport, campus, or business park. This allows owners to tailor the network to specific needs and requirements.

The key differences between public and private 5G have to do with restricted access and isolation. Typically, the public 5G networks available through service providers offer equal access rights to all users, sometimes leading to degraded service performance. A higher service availability is fundamental to support always-on operations. 

A private 5G network offers greater control. Unlike public 5G, a private 5G network can be reconfigured to permit different levels of access when certain network activities are deemed more business-critical than others.

Open RAN is a revolutionary shift in mobile network design, allowing service providers to use components from different vendors. This open approach is guided by industry standards, enabling flexibility and innovation in the creation of mobile network equipment. In Open RAN, traditional components like remote radio heads and baseband units are replaced with disaggregated radio units, distributed units, and centralized units. These components can be virtualized or containerized, offering programmable, intelligent, and interoperable functions. The O-RAN Alliance, established in 2018, defines the standards for Open RAN, bringing together global stakeholders in telecommunications. Open RAN represents the future of wireless communication, emphasizing openness, flexibility, and collaboration among suppliers.

As the volume of data generated by embedded devices continues to surge, edge computing will play a pivotal role in optimizing wireless communication. By relocating computation and data processing closer to the network’s edge, embedded systems can reduce latency, enhance real-time decision-making, and alleviate bandwidth constraints.

The concept of mesh networking, where devices communicate with one another to form a network without relying on a centralized infrastructure, holds significant promise for embedded systems. Mesh networks provide increased reliability, scalability, and flexibility. They enable self-healing capabilities, allowing devices to reroute data and ensure continuous connectivity, even in cases of individual node failures.

Conclusion

Choosing the most suitable network connectivity option for your IoT project is a decision that hinges on your device requirements and the ultimate project goals. It’s a delicate balance, primarily involving trade-offs among power consumption, available bandwidth, and network coverage.

In specific scenarios, technologies like LoRa and LoRaWAN can prove to be fantastic choices. For other cases, options like WiFi or Ethernet might be clear and straightforward. Furthermore, modern cellular solutions, exemplified by innovations like Notecard, have brought global IoT connectivity into the realm of reality.

The IoT landscape continues to expand and evolve, offering a diverse range of connectivity options serving various applications. By carefully assessing your project’s unique demands and keeping the trade-offs in mind, you can make an informed choice that aligns perfectly with your IoT objectives.

Interested to know more? Get in touch with us for details.